Feed a lawyer, or else …

Family Law

Alamo


I have exhausted all legal means and venues as prescribed by our legal system. On each and every step in the process I encountered layers of corruption, cronyism and personal ties among participants. The whole case, with legal arguments and timeline of events is summarized in following PDF document -> Judicial Corruption

.

Man stages hunger strike to protest injustice in Santa Clara, CA, Family Court

  • My name is Mirko Vojnovic. I used to be an engineer. A good one; 10 US Patents approved and two pending. I have been working hard all my life. I came to this country as a young engineer, hoping that the only laws I would be dealing with would be the laws of physics. It did not turn out that way.
  • On February 21st, 2012, my home of 20 years was sold on foreclosure auction. In few days I will be homeless.
  • I didn’t lose my home because I made a bad business decision or a bad investment. I didn’t lose my home because I was living a lavish lifestyle; or because I was drinking or gambling; or because I was doing drugs. I did not, and do not, do any of those things.
  • I was robbed, in broad daylight, by the people who were sworn to abide by the law and enforce the law. I did not allow them to take my daughter away from me. I won that battle, but lost everything else during a seven year ordeal.

–   I have been robbed by divorce attorneys who perjured themselves numerous times.

–   I have been robbed by judges who are protecting those attorneys.

–   I have been robbed by legal institutions and regulatory bodies who are protecting those judges and attorneys.

–   I have been robbed by cronies who infested our judicial system. And I am not alone.

(To learn more about the case please visit www.feedalawyer.wordpress.com)

(To learn more about Family Court problems visit: Center for Judicial Excellence: http://www.centerforjudicialexcellence.org)

  • I will not be a silent victim. They did not take away my dignity. I, as everybody else, deserve my unalienable Rights, to Life,Libertyand the pursuit of Happiness without oppression.
  • I decided to conduct this hunger strike, starting on Monday April 9, 2012, in front of Santa Clara Family Court (170 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA) with the intention to bring public awareness and demand accountability for fraud and perjury that is rampant in the family courts; not only to help myself, but also other parents and their children in similar situations.

I will end my hunger strike once the following conditions are met:

  1. Santa Clara DA’s office to prosecute attorneys Stefan P. Kennedy and Tamara T. Costa for perjury and to prosecute other open cases against parties who committed perjury and/or are guilty of public corruption, including DDA John Chase; and sue for damages; i.e. collapse of my business, depleting of my lifetime savings and personal injuries.
  2. Attorney General to prosecute retired judge Neal Anthony Cabrinha, his accomplices in staged disqualification proceedings and State Bar cronies who protected attorneys Kennedy and Costa.
  3. Immediate processing of my claims against the Santa Clara County by Santa Clara Board of Supervisors and the State of California by California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board.

At the same time I appeal to ValleyOne Investment, LLC to delay the eviction process.

Mirko Vojnovic                                                       e-mail: mirko_vojnovic@yahoo.com

2335 Menzel Place                                                  tel: 408-644-2717

Santa Clara, CA95050                                             blog: www.feedalawyer.wordpress.com

March 15, 2012 Posted by | Family Law, Law | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Singing to the deaf


Deaf Karaoke Live – The Ultimate Version

.

After receiving a letter from The Commission on Judicial Performance that my complaint against judge Neal Cabrinha and judge Lynn Durjee was rejected, I called them and talked to staff counsel Karen Clay.  She advised me to write a letter to Director Chief Counsel Victoria B. Henley.   If you think I received an answer – think again.  Letter outlining conflict of interest was completely ignored.

I was singing to the deaf… 🙂

Today is February 4th, 2012…

.

.

Santa Clara,CA

January 2, 2012

Director Chief Counsel Victoria B. Henley
Commission on Judicial Performance
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco,CA94102

 

Dear Chief Counsel,

My name is Mirko Vojnovic and I’m writing this letter appalled by the way CJP handled the case of Santa Clara Family Court Judge Neal Cabrinha and Marine County Judge Lynn Duryee.

On December 14, 2011, I received a letter from The Commission on Judicial Performance. Letter states that CJP has determined “not to take further action with respect to (my) complaint dated August 17, 2011…“.

The said complaint was against Santa Clara Family Court judge Neal Anthony Cabrinha for failure to prosecute perjury and for staging fake disqualification hearing involving Marine County judge Lynn Duryee and possibly Supreme Court’s Justice Ming Chin.    Connection between those three individuals is documented in my complaint.

CJP’s letter also states that Commission member, Honorable Erica R. Yew, was recused.

So, question arises… why? …who is she?

Closer look at what is available on the web reveals (link):

  1. Hon. Erica R. Yew was appointed to CJP by the Supreme Court of California.
  2. Hon. Erica R. Yew is at the same time a member of the Supreme Court’s Judicial Council.
  3. According to the Judicial Council’s website: ”The council carries out this mission primarily through the work of its advisory committees and task forces…”
  4. Again, according to the Judicial Council’s website, Task Forces and Other Advisory/Working groups include:

a.   Commission for Impartial Courts, whose members are Justice Ming Chin and Judge Lynn Duryee.

b.   Domestic Violence Practice and Procedure Task Force, Hon. Erica R. Yew is a member.

c.   Self-Represented Litigants Task Force, Hon. Erica R. Yew is also a member.

Commission’s decision to recuse Hon. Erica R. Yew seems appropriate, but it also means that Commission acknowledged that at least one of their members had conflict of interest in this case.

HOWEVER!

Honorable Judith D. McConnell is CJP Committee’s Chairperson. She is also a member of the Commission for Impartial Courts Steering Committee, where Justice Ming Chin is the chairman (EXHIBIT 3).  Judge Lynn Duryee is also a member of the Commission for Impartial Courts. Why was Hon. Judith D. McConnell not recused? She definitely had the conflict of interest being involved with this case and as CJP Committee’s Chairperson had/has the biggest possible influence on the case. Where is non appearance of bias here?

Prompted by my research I wanted to learn more about how my case was handled. On December 21, 2011, at 3:45, I called CJP and talked to Staff Counsel Karen Clay[1] who was in charge of my case. She confirmed that she was an attorney who was handling the case, and that is all I got from her.

Questions like: Who made the recommendation?… How was the recommendation made”… What was the basis for CJP’s decision to dismiss the case”… all went unanswered. Even though she told me that attorneys usually make recommendations for the Committee, she did not answer whether she, as an attorney who worked on my case, made such recommendation.

When I asked why Hon. Erica Yew was recused, Ms. Clay said that was probably to AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF BIAS and continued to be elusive on other questions. At my remark that without any explanation on how and why CJP made their decision, that would make CJP operating like some secret organization, I was told that was “my opinion”.   She continued to be dismissive as in “decision had been made; case is closed; go away” until I mentioned CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND APPEARANCE OF BIAS that Hon. Judith D. McConnell has in this case. When I requested to know why McConnell was not recused, ONLY THEN, I was given your name, and told to write you a letter. This is what I’m doing now, but without any high hopes, because I experienced how “street politics” and corrupt power brokers conduct their business.

In essence, this case is very simple:

  1. Attorneys lying under oath committed perjury.
  2. Perjury is criminal act under California Penal Code, so those attorneys are criminals.
  3. Judge Neal Cabrinha protects criminal attorneys which is crime in itself; so he is a criminal.
  4. CJP protecting criminal judge is guilty of public corruption.

.

.

Please advise what further action, if any, your organization will take in this case.

Sincerely,

Mirko Vojnovic

Santa Clara


[1]  I called her three times that day but “she was not available”. Previous day I talked to Ms. Clay briefly and asked her to tell me when she is going to be available the next day to answer some of the questions I had. She told me to call her “any time tomorrow”. Apparently, for most of the day on December 21, 2011, I was given a runaround.

February 4, 2012 Posted by | Family Law | , , , , | 3 Comments

Ring Around the Rosie, Part 2


Today, December 14, 2011, I received a letter from The Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP). Letter states that CJP has determined “not to take further action with respect to complaint dated August 17, 2011…“.

The said complaint was against Santa Clara Family Court judge Neal Anthony Cabrinha for failure to prosecute perjury and for staging fake disqualification hearing involving Marine County judge Lynn Duryee and possibly Supreme Court’s Justice Ming Chin. (link1) (link2)

.

Commission member Honorable Erica R. Yew was recused.

So, question arises… why? …who is she?

.

Closer look at what is available on the web reveals:

.

1.   Hon. Erica R. Yew was appointed to CJP by the Supreme Court of California. (link)

2.   Hon. Erica R. Yew is at the same time a member of the Supreme Court’s Judicial Council. (link)

3.   According to the Judicial Council’s website:  “The council carries out this mission primarily through the work of its advisory committees and task forces…” (link)

4.   Again, according to the Judicial Council’s website, Task Forces and Other Advisory/Working groups include (link):

……….a.   Commission for Impartial Courts, whose members are Justice Ming Chin and Lynn Duryee. (link)

……….b.   Domestic Violence Practice and Procedure Task Force, Hon. Erica R. Yew is a member. (link)

……….c.   Self-Represented Litigants Task Force, Hon. Erica R. Yew is also a member . (link)

.

Commission’s decision to recuse Hon. Erica R. Yew seems appropriate, but it also means that Commission acknowledged that at least one of their members had conflict of interest in this case.

.

What about recusing Honorable Judith D. McConnell, Committee’s Chairperson? She is a member of the Commission for Impartial Courts Steering Committee, where Justice Ming Chin is the chairman (link).  Judge Lynn Duryee is also a member of the Commission for Impartial Courts.

.

Further discovery is needed to find out what really happened. Stay tuned; update will be available soon.

December 14, 2011 Posted by | Family Law, Law, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments